I believe that the individual that had the greatest positive influence on Charles Darwin’s development of his theory of natural selection, was Rev. Thomas Robert Malthus.
Thomas Malthus was a political economist who wrote “Essay on the Principle of Population” (1798), in which he argued “population will always tend to outrun the growth of production. The increase of population will take place, if unchecked, in a geometric progression, while the means of subsistence will increase in only an arithmetic progression. Population will always expand to the limit of subsistence and will be held there by famine, war, and ill health. Vice, misery, and self-restraint alone could check this excessive growth.” (Malthusian Theory). Stated simply, people can produce more offspring that can possibly survive and will if left unchecked. According to WWW.UCMP.BERKELEY.EDU, Darwin wrote in his 1876 autobiography, “In October 1838, that is, fifteen months after I had begun my systematic inquiry, I happened to read for amusement Malthus on Population, and being well prepared to appreciate the struggle for existence which everywhere goes on from long-continued observation of the habits of animals and plants, it at once struck me that under these circumstances favourable variations would tend to be preserved, and unfavourable ones to be destroyed. The results of this would be the formation of a new species. Here, then I had at last got a theory by which to work".
The bullet point that identifies with Malthus’ work is: “Resources are limited”. As Malthus stated in “Essay on the Principle of Population” all populations suffer because they produce more offspring than there are resources. Populations increase exponentially, but the amount of resources is generally finite. The example given by the professor is a great example; a population of bunnies could grow exponentially, but there is only so much food, water and shelter to sustain them. Darwin (and also Alfred Russel Wallace) took this further and surmised that siblings would have to compete, and only those individuals who were best suited to obtain the necessary resources would survive. Those individuals would pass their favorable traits to their offspring and so on and so on, “favorable variations would tend to be preserved, and unfavorable ones to be destroyed”, natural selection at work.
As you can see from the above quote from Darwin’s autobiography, Darwin was heavily influenced by Malthus’ work. I don’t know if I would say Darwin couldn’t have developed his theory of natural selection without Malthus’ influence, but I believe it gave him (and Wallace) an epiphany he may have taken a while longer to get to.
Darwin delayed publication of his book “On the Origin of Species” for 20 years. Though there are several theories for this delay, the prominent theory suggests that Darwin was well aware of the affect his work would have on the scientific and religious communities of his time. Darwin himself wrote that his theory was “like admitting to a murder”, the murder of Christianity. I’m sure Darwin knew all too well the backlash he would receive from the church and the religious society as a whole and he was in no hurry to subject himself or his family to the public ridicule or denunciation by the church he expected from the publication of his theory.
Thomas,
ReplyDeleteI too wrote about Malthus as being a big influence to Darwin. I find the study of people and resources fascinating. There has been a lot of talk about this world eventually running out of food. In 2008 there was a food crisis that shocked countries such as the Philippines and Egypt. This caused serious malnutrition for millions. If we see a more serious crisis in our future, it may lead to a "survival of the fittest" situation where the rich and strong survive! Great post!
Lindsay
I found your post on Rev. Thomas Robert Malthus very enlightening as I really wasn't too familiar with his work until now. I chose Charles Lyell as Darwin's biggest influence as I felt he adopted Lyell's theory of geological Uniformitarianism and applied it to his theory of evolution and it fit. Lyell also provided the crucial missing piece in giving his theory credence which was the time frame. The fact that Lyell discovered that the geographical changes on earth occurred by natural processes and happened very slowly over time which means the earth was incredibly ancient, gave Darwin the time frame he needed to make his theories work.Lyell's scientific principles were paramount to giving Darwin's theories credibility and elicited heated debates about evolution and Catastrophism (Creationism) even to this day.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the two quotes you have used to describe Malthus' work and Darwin's recognition of its value to his own, but quotes should support your own writing instead of replacing it. Make sure that most of the writing in your post is your own words, using quotes as secondary explanations.
ReplyDeleteSomething to note is that Malthus used natural populations as examples of how organisms can stay in balance with their resources, noting that these natural populations tend to not experience the extreme events we see in human populations, such as famine, war and disease. Darwin noted this comparison and it led him to ask why those natural populations don't overpopulation, even thought they possess the same potential to grow exponentially. It was questions like this that led Darwin to the idea of resource competition and differential reproductive success.
Good choice of bullet points and good explanations.
"...but I believe it gave him (and Wallace) an epiphany he may have taken a while longer to get to."
Precisely. Well explained.
Great discussion in the final section. Good insights. Except for the over-reliance upon quotes in the first section, good post.
Hi Thomas,
ReplyDeleteThomas Malthus was a good positive influence on Charles Darwin I believe too, His essay on Principle of Population and Malthusian Theory. His points stating that the population will increase to the limit of subsistence and be held there by famine, war, and illness I believe is a very true statement even to this day. I chose to write about Lamarck, and reading your post has informed me much more than when I had read this earlier. Your quote from Darwin’s autobiography was definitely heavily influenced by Malthus’s work and I think he was a big influence to help further Darwin to be able to develop his theory of natural selection due to the idea that only the best suited individuals who could obtain the necessary resources would be able to survive and pass on the favorable traits to the next generation while the other non suited would die off. I agree that the world at the time with how strongly influenced it was by church and religion would have delayed his publication of his book. I really enjoyed your post!
This post was very informative and I learned a lot of information I didn't know before hand. I think it is really cool to see how Malthus influenced Darwin and his thoughts on things even the quote from Darwins autobiography you can see how heavily influenced he was by Malthus. As far as why he took so long because of the church is because I think it was something so far against what the Bible says so I would be scared to make a theory as well. I am a Christian and don't believe in evolution but think it is really vital to see where scientists have come up with things and developed and piggy backed off of each other.
ReplyDelete